Most recently, the bill was passed by a bipartisan 4016 vote in the Republican-controlled Arizona House, 2818 in Republican-controlled Oklahoma Senate, 574 in Republican-controlled New York Senate, and 3721 in Democratic-controlled Oregon House." Some critics argue that more people would vote in a direct popular election, according to the University of the Pacific. Part of HuffPost Politics. Advantages of the NPV Interstate Compact 1. A switch to the popular vote would eliminate the concept of a battleground state because the issue would be more on issues than states. Two-thirds of the campaign events were in four states, Florida, Iowa, Virginia, and Ohio, that year. 7. State Question 820 lays out a statutory framework for a recreational industry that would begin about 90 days after election results are certified. A Critique of the National Popular Vote October 13, 2008 Policy Analysis No. This post was published on the now-closed HuffPost Contributor platform. Feb 25, 2023. 4. Under the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system votes in small states, like Wyoming or Delaware count double what votes in large states like California or Texas. Under the National Popular Vote plan,the compact would take effect only when enabling legislation has been enacted by states collectively possessing a majority of the electoral votes:270 of 538 total. The NPV movement seeks to create an unfair and unconstitutional system that diminishes the voting rights of citizens throughout the country and raises the prospect of increased voter fraud and. People are moving to live in like-minded communities more than ever before. It awards all the bonus votes to the winner of the popular vote. The National Popular Vote Bill is not a Democrat or Republican bill. In U.S. history, there has been one vice-presidential candidate who died after being nominated and one that withdrew from their partys ticket. Lastly, the biggest problem that the Electoral College produces is the reality that a persons vote really doesnt matter (Black). 5. But the biggest problem with changing how we elect our president using the NPV Compact is that its too easy to change it back. You can use essay samples to find ideas and inspiration for your paper. This brings us to 196 of the 270 electoral votes needed to activate the pact. According to Article II, Section 1, "Each State shall appoint, in such Manner as the Legislature thereof may direct, a Number of Electors, equal to the whole Number of Senators and Representatives to which the State may be entitled in the Congress." The National Popular Vote stems from the winner-take-all approach that validates the presidential candidate interactions with only 4 out of 50 dates during their campaign. Imagine a scenario where a presidential candidate focuses on Los Angeles, New York City, Portland, OR and Seattle. The National Popular Vote plan is a bill passed by participating state legislatures agreeing that they will cast all of their electoral votes for the presidential candidate winning the nationwide popular vote. You are also agreeing to our Terms of Service and Privacy Policy. A close election would trigger the need for a full recount. HuffPost's top politics stories, straight to your inbox. Currently, 48 of the 50 states follow the winner-take-all rule. The issue raised by the National Popular Vote campaign is fundamental: What kind of a democracy should America be? As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath "The National Popular Vote Plan." The Electoral College distorts presidential campaigns . A popular vote election would bring the presidential election in line with the rest of the election structures. and our Electoral votes are designated among the states based on Census. Would you like to get a custom essay? In a direct popular election, a candidate could theoretically win without having broad support throughout the country. Because its so hard to get an amendment to the Constitution passed that means that once it becomes law it will probably remain so for a long time because the bar to change it back is so high. If a popular vote were allowed to declare a winner instead, it wouldnt be through a state-by-state counting of electoral votes. The official 2016 election results from the Electoral College gave Donald J. Trump the victory with 306 electoral votes v. Hillary Clinton's 232 votes. This has occurred in 5 of the nation's 56 presidential elections, most recently in 2016. The NPV Interstate Compact does not eliminate the very complicated Electoral College system that most voters dont really understand. Retrieved from https://www.thoughtco.com/the-national-popular-vote-plan-3322047. Without any sort of broad support, the politics of the country could become even more fractured than they already are. An electoral college would solve . In 2016, Hillary Clinton had more than 10 million of these votes, while Donald Trump had more than 8.3 million, even though Trump won 30 states and Clinton won 20 and the District of Columbia. Under the electoral college system of voting, the number of representatives a state has in Congress (Senators and Representatives) is the total number of electoral votes it is allowed. 1, 2023 at 1:16 PM PST. It was a great idea in 1787 but the country has changed since 1787 and the people today want to elect the president by a simple, direct popular vote where whoever gets the most votes wins like we do in every other election in the country. In 2004, for example, candidates George W. Bush and John Kerry campaigned heavily in states such as Nevada while ignoring political issues in New York, a state that Kerry was sure to win, according to the University of the Pacific. That is hardly a mandate for governing, though it would be taken as such. To determine the National Popular Vote winner, state election officials simply would tally the nationwide vote for president based on each states official results. Our state will likely vote overwhelmingly for the Republican challenger to Barack Obama in November. But with the NPV Compact a change in party control of just one or two states could restore the old system of electing the president and then four years later it could be changed back. 2. Under the electoral college system (and other voting systems not based on popular voting), it only takes one extra vote more than the other candidate to create the needed results for the election. First it would be relatively easy to implement. The country could become less stable and divided if he or she did not have a vast amount of support (Richards). It is our national motto and is so for a reason. The states' approval of the compact is a victory for democracy and the principle of "one person, one vote." Under the electoral college system, the candidates which receive the most votes in each state (or district) receive its assigned electoral votes. In fact, the National Popular Vote Interstate Compact, which has now been adopted by 15 states and the District of Columbia, totaling 196 electoral votes, is an actionable and realistic . Without the popular vote bill, swing states would continue to get more leverage and attention from candidates to ensure that they would be able to capture their votes. It has been enacted into law in 11 states with 165 electoral votes, and will take effect when enacted by states with 105 more. As a result, an agreement between a group of states to cast all of their electoral votes in a similar manner, as proposed by the National Popular Vote plan passes constitutional muster. Although this may limit the amount of diversity that occurs in office, and may generate extra financial costs, the argument could be made that these risks outweigh the results of an election where a majority of states, not a majority of people, put someone into office. Under the system of proportional representation, any party with a high enough percentage of the vote will receive a seat in the government. Not only it already happened five times, but in theory, a candidate could win the presidency with only 22% of the popular vote in a two-candidates race. 4. If that was to take place, America could potentially face the same issues it is facing now. The National Popular Vote bill will take effect when enacted into law by states possessing 270 electoral votes a majority of the current 538 electoral votes. Due to some states being heavily populated in comparison to others, that may help a candidate quickly obtain a win. Steve Sisolak vetoed it. By adding this new interstate compact to the Electoral College/Winner-Take-All system to elect our president we are in fact making this system even more complicated and even harder for the voters to understand. Common Cause This brings us to 196 of the 270 (73%) electoral votes needed to activate the pact just 74 votes away. And that would lead to chaos in how political parties campaign for president and could also undermine the legitimacy of the process. This advance is referred to as the winner-take-all approach. The framers enacted the provisions relating to the Electoral College to allow for state innovation. The National Bonus Plan was proposed by historian Arthur Schlesinger, Jr. That created a voter value of 2.85. That offers the possibility that someone unwilling or unable to hold the office could be elected. E pluribus unum -- out of many, one. PDF Problems With the National Popular Vote Plan Change). It sees a healthy and vibrant democracy needing the underpinnings of civil society that rests on the sustained and active engagement of the citizenry and promotes approaches that seek to maximize that involvement. Right now, the President of the United States is not elected by a popular vote. If the National Popular Vote bill was secured within the American government, it would protect every vote and would allow those votes to equally matter in the presidential election. Second, some believe itll intensify election problems, such as illegally extended voting hours or irregularly high voter turnout (Richards). A faithless elector in the United States is someone who casts an electoral ballot for someone other than the individuals to whom they are pledged. National Popular Vote - Pros and Cons : r/NeutralPolitics - reddit Research & Policy - National Conference of State Legislatures How Many Electoral Votes Does a Candidate Need to Win? Their vote only counts at the local level, not the national level, because of the electoral votes. With the polarization in global politics today, especially in the United States, a switch to the popular vote would likely increase costs even further. Would it aid a fight to eliminate first past the post or would it further entrench the established party system voters American voters have expressed disdain for. cons of the national popular vote plan 8. As a result, the bill will take effect when enacted by states possessing an additional 74 electoral votes. As of now, 15 states and Washington, D.C. have joined the National Popular Vote compact: Connecticut, Rhode Island, Vermont, Hawaii, Massachusetts, Maryland, Washington, New Jersey, Illinois, New York, California, Colorado, New Mexico, Delaware and Oregon. That, in turn, would likely diminish voter turnout. It makes things easier for extreme parties to gain representation. All other elections in the U.S. are through the popular vote. Currently, the National Popular Vote bill has 172 electoral votes. The Electoral College was established in the Constitution to protect minority interests and mitigate the possibility of a regional candidate. Majority supports changing Electoral College system for U.S Here are six reasons why legislators should reject this attempt to jettison our electoral system: 1. As of July 2020, a National Popular Vote bill has been signed into law in 16 states controlling a total of 196 electoral votes, including 4 small states, 8 medium-sized states, 3 big states (California, Illinois, and New York), and the District of Columbia. A plan to enact the National Popular Vote was introduced in the Michigan Legislature on Wednesday. Change), You are commenting using your Facebook account. As the National Popular Vote (NPV) movement steps up its effort to impose a direct election for president, attempting to enlist states with a sufficient number of electors to constitute a majority (268) and to bind them to the winner of the national popular vote, those states considering the proposal might first reflect on the nightmare aftermath of the 2000 presidential election. List of the Cons of Proportional Representation. According to the University of Missouri-Kansas City Law School, some proponents of the Electoral College argue that it isolates election problems, such as illegally extended voting hours or irregularly high voter turnout. It would reduce the influence of third parties on the U.S. presidential election. This has occurred in only four of the 58 presidential . An individuals vote doesnt make a difference when it is counted against the votes of the delegates in the House of Representatives and Senate. Is the National Popular Vote Plan Constitutional? The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact (NPVIC) is an agreement among a group of U.S. states and the District of Columbia to award all their electoral votes to whichever presidential ticket wins the overall popular vote in the 50 states and the District of Columbia. A direct popular election would make it more possible for third-party candidates to succeed and would also encourage political parties to become more radical and extreme. 3. The National Popular Vote plan would eliminate what critics of the Electoral College system point to as the "winner-take-all" rule - the awarding all of a state's electoral votes to the candidate who receives the most popular votes in that state. 10 Apr. Because of the winner-take-all rule, a candidate can be elected president without winning the most popular votes nationwide. Reddit and its partners use cookies and similar technologies to provide you with a better experience. National Popular Vote Movement - Common Cause | Get Involved And thats not how it should be in a democracy. Because there was a difference of less than 1,000 tabulated votes between George W. Bush and Al Gore in one state, Florida, the nation watched as 6 million votes were recounted by machine, several hundred thousand were recounted by hand in counties with differing recount standards, partisan litigators fought each other in state and federal courts, the secretary of state backed by the majority of state legislators (all Republicans) warred with the state's majority Democratic judiciary -- until 37 days after the election the U.S. Supreme Court, in a bitterly controversial 5-4 decision effectively declared Bush the winner. F. Kennedy, Richard Nixon, Bill Clinton and George W. Bush were elected with less than a majority of the votes cast. This move would ensure that the Presidency would be given to the candidate that received the most popular votes all 50 states and the District of Columbia. They have only won the popular vote once. And in all states but Maine and Nebraska, the candidate who receives the most votes in that state is awarded all of its electoral votes, whether the split is 51% to 49% or 99% to 1%. The Electoral College is made up of 538 electors and a majority of 270 electoral votes is mandatory to nominate the President. ThoughtCo. That effectively means that votes in the the 75% of the country that are in swing states effectively dont count at all. Once effective, states could withdraw from the compact at any time except during the six-month window between July 20 of an election year and Inauguration Day (January 20). This blog post is a joint effort with Leslie Francis, former executive director of the Democratic National Committee and Democratic Congressional Campaign Committee. Just another site cons of the national popular vote plan . For example, if a state used NPV and voted for candidate A, but candidate B received the most votes nationwide, the state would allocate its presidential electors to candidate B. Inkwell | Everything You Need to Know About the National Popular Vote 9 Pros and Cons of Electoral College | APECSEC.org Because a direct election would be, by definition, national and resource allocation would be overwhelmingly dominated by paid television advertising, there would be little impetus for grass-roots activity. With a popular vote in place, each election win would be decreed a mandate to follow the platform of the winning party. Our experts will write for you an essay on any topic, with any deadline and requirements from scratch, Electoral College and National Popular Vote Pros and Cons. Candidates get one vote for every congressional district they win, and then two votes for winning the state-wide vote. The National Popular Vote Plan. The electoral requires that an election which does not receive a majority of electoral votes be taken into the U.S. House of Representatives. The National Popular Vote Interstate Compact is an agreement where states in the compact award all their electoral votes to the winner of the . 2. Congressional District Method - Electoral College Reform - Weebly Electoral college reform proposals include (1) the district plan, awarding each state's two at-large electoral votes to the statewide popular vote winners, and one electoral vote to the winning candidates in each congressional district; (2) the proportional plan, awarding electoral votes in states in direct proportion to the popular vote gained The National Popular Vote plan is a bill passed by participating state legislatures agreeing that they will cast all of their electoral votes for the presidential candidate winning the nationwide popular vote. document.getElementById( "ak_js_1" ).setAttribute( "value", ( new Date() ).getTime() ); Enter your email address to follow this blog and receive notifications of new posts by email. By continuing well assume youre on board with our, https://samploon.com/electoral-college-and-national-popular-vote-pros-and-cons/, Select a writer from a large pool of experts. Ken Bickers. Samploon is a database of free essay samples. There are pros and cons to both systems. Pros And Cons Of Popular Vote - 558 Words | Studymode Ten reasons I support the National Popular Vote | MinnPost Gov Flashcards | Quizlet For under its plan, the next time the U.S. has very close national vote, a recount would not be of six million votes in one state but of more than 130 million votes in all states and the District of Columbia, all with their own rules for conducting a recount. For the 7 presidential elections between 1992-2016, the Republican candidate has won the Electoral college 3 times. Home| Government| Elections| Electoral College| Electoral College Pros And Cons. Today, the fact that Nebraska and Maine do not use the winner-take-all system serves as proof that modifying the Electoral College system, as proposed by the National Popular Vote plan is constitutional and does not require a constitutional amendment. Definition and Examples. However, in the popular vote, Trump only received 62,984,825 votes against Hillary Clinton's 65,853,516 popular votes. A Critique of the National Popular Vote | Cato Institute List of the Cons of Using the Popular Vote 1. Removing this system could encourage more people to come out to support their candidate. That would increase the amount of polarization being experienced in politics today because there would be less of a need to compromise. But the national popular vote plan doesn't require a .
Andy King Cause Of Death,
How To Achieve Nurse Practitioner Core Competencies,
How Is The Mediterranean Sea Helpful To Archaeologists?,
Slime Rancher How To Get To Ring Island Vault,
How To Make A Pulley With Household Items,
Articles C