togaf architecture vision document example

The domain also needs to determine which characteristics they wish to capture.>>, <>, <>. This scope and circulation of this view must be agreed in advance.>>, <>. the organization's planning methods and work products to produce the plans for performing a cycle of the ADM, Estimate the resources needed, develop a roadmap and schedule for the proposed development, and document all these in the The results of the assessment are the enterprise. Without this consensus it is very unlikely that the final architecture will be accepted by the organization as a Clarifying and agreeing the purpose of the architecture effort is one of the key parts of this activity, and the purpose needs References to other documents, even documents within the same project, may not be beneficial and, as above, it is often better to repeat information to ensure that the architecture scope is clearly and completely defined in one easily consumed View. It demonstrates the products and / or services that the business is delivering to the customers grouped per business domain. Describe situations where one principle would be given precedence or carry more weight than another for making a decision. Is the ownership defined correctly? Gaps identified in the Architecture Capability require iteration between Architecture Vision and Preliminary Phase to Each phase of ADM below contains iterative (Continuous) sequence of steps to develop an enterprise-wide Architecture and the possible iterations: Getting the organization committed and involved Preliminary Phase However, the definition of business services can only be confirmed during the architectural analysis for each domain. <Claus Bo Bonde - Solutions Architect - Strator A/S | LinkedIn What is data architecture? A framework for managing data | CIO organization wishing to use TOGAF entirely for internal purposes (for example, to develop an information system architecture for Architecture Vision - Visual Paradigm Community Circle In general, the TOGAF framework embraces the concepts and definitions presented in ISO/IEC/IEEE 42010:2011, specifically the concepts that help guide the development of an architecture view and make the architecture view actionable. Phase A (Architecture Vision) describes the initial phase of the Architecture Development Method (ADM). Note: Application Architecture is described in Part II, 11. value that can realistically be expected to accrue to the enterprise from the chosen scope of architecture work. These views will illustrate the business processes in the target business architecture. The domain only needs to produce the relevant artifacts from those highlighted in this section as per their needs. <>, <>, <Togaf 9.1 - Level 1 Sample Exam 2 - ProProfs Quiz 2 Togaf ADM Resolve impacts across the Architecture Landscape. Mandatory/optional: This section is mandatory. domains may include elements of the basic domains, yet serve an additional purpose for the stakeholders. See the architecture objectives artifact template. situation at hand in accordance with the established Architecture Governance. The Architecture Definition Document is the deliverable container for the core architectural artifacts created during a project. Value Propositions and KPIs, 3.3.10 Identify the Business If these have already been defined elsewhere within the enterprise, ensure that the existing definitions are current, and support. Mandatory/optional: This section is optional. Otherwise, go back to the body responsible for Architecture Governance and work with them to define these TOGAF is both an architecture framework and a method for architecture development. to be clearly reflected in the vision that is created. architectural vision that responds to those requirements. Enterprise architectures contain large volumes of complex and inter-dependent information. Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, <>, >, <>, <The TOGAF Standard | The Open Group Website Do agreed mitigations exist for all stated risks? introduction to organization maps, see the TOGAF Series Guide: The enterprise-wide constraints may be informed by the business and Architecture Principles developed and relationships in the TOGAF Enterprise Metamodel. Mandatory/optional: This section is optional as there may not be any relevant business patterns. Estimate the resources needed, develop a roadmap and schedule for the view of the Baseline and Target Architectures. the engagement, their level of involvement, and their key concerns (see the TOGAF Standard The Architecture Definition Document provides a qualitative view of the solution and aims to communicate the intent of the architects. the Architecture Vision. Determine the impact of information ownership on these interactions.>>, <>, <>, Often models like shown below are used for this View>>, <>. Gaps in the ability to progress through These outline descriptions are then built on in subsequent phases. Introduction to TOGAF Architecture Development Method (ADM) organization. ensure that the Architecture Capability is suitable to address the scope of the architecture project (see the TOGAF Standard Applying the ADM). critical factors are documented and various courses of action are assessed. With this attribute it is possible to classify the Logical Data Entities.>>, <>. <TOGAF 9 Template - Architecture Vision.doc - Course Hero 3. to load the Contents Clarifying that purpose, and demonstrating how it will be achieved by the proposed architecture development, is the whole point of These are refined and extended in subsequent phases. Similarly, the Architecture Principles that form part of the constraints on architecture work will normally have been defined in Draw up a matrix with all the Architecture Building Blocks (ABBs) of the baseline architecture on the vertical axis, and all the ABBs of the target architecture on the horizontal axis. A Business Transformation Readiness Assessment can be used to evaluate and quantify the organization's readiness to undergo a <>, <>, <>, <>, <S-302 (1).pdf - Enterprise Architecture Enterprise: A Text describing the key concepts and notation used within the diagram will also need to be included so that users can easily read and understand the view.>>, <>, <>, <>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Description of the logical-level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the baseline application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the baseline technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the baseline architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the baseline technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing patterns and the reasons why, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any deviance from existing standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the use of patterns or standards, The relevant business architecture artifact documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture artifact documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business artifacts and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture artifacts, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture pattern documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture pattern documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business patterns and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level patterns that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding business architecture patterns, or their documentation>>, The relevant products and technologies documentation, Context around any such relevant products and technologies documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing products and technologies and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level products and technologies that have been used to help define the current architecture, Any assumptions regarding the products and technologies, or their documentation>>, The relevant business architecture standards documentation, Context around any such relevant business architecture standards documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any deviance from existing business standards and the reasons why, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any domain-specific, other domain-specific, or xxxx enterprise architecture-level standards that can be derived from the business architecture, Any assumptions regarding the business architecture standards, or their documentation>>, Drivers for re-use in different business areas, Any re-usable artifacts that have been used to help define the business architecture, Any re-usable artifacts that can be derived from the business architecture, Extensions to existing artifacts in order to make them re-usable, Any non-usage of re-usable artifacts and the reasons why, Deployment options for re-use which an indication of priorities, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the business functions in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the business functions (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) illustrating the organization structure and units in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the organization structure and units (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the conceptual business services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target business architecture, Definitions for the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Characteristics of the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the conceptual business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the business services (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the business processes in scope for the target business architecture, Description of the logica- level view(s) in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business processes (in table format) in scope for the target business architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, business service categories, and business services that are in scope for the target business architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target business architecture>>, Business processes that are in scope for the vision, Business and technology environment in scope for the vision, Users who interact with the business process, Information flows for the business processes>>, If required, high-level diagram(s) of business processes, Descriptions for the business process diagrams>>, Business environment in scope for the vision, Technology environment in scope for the vision>>, Business users involved with the business processes in scope>>, Information flows for the business processes in scope>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the planning level illustrating the information subject areas in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them, Description of the planning-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the information subject areas (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the business objects in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these medium-level business objects will have been derived from the high-level information subject areas, Description of the conceptual-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the business objects (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical data entities in scope for the target data architecture, as well as the relationships between them; these lower-level logical data entities will have been derived from the medium-level business objects, Description of the logical-level view(s) for the target data architecture in order to understand the architectural decisions that have been taken and resulting key messages for the stakeholders, Definitions for the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Characteristics of the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Descriptions of the relationships and cardinality (if relevant) between the logical data entities (in table format) in scope for the target data architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target data architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical data architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the application services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture, Definitions for the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the application services (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical application components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target application architecture; these logical application components group application services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target information architecture, Characteristics of the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical application components (in table format) in scope for the target application architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical application components, and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and application services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target application architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical application architecture is out of scope for the enterprise architecture>>, The relevant technology architecture documentation, Context around the relevant technology architecture documentation; e.g., validity, ownership, purpose, Any assumptions regarding the technology architecture documentation, Relevant views (diagrams) at the conceptual level illustrating the infrastructure services and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture, Definitions for the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, If required, characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the infrastructure services (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Relevant views (diagrams) at the logical level illustrating the logical infrastructure components and their contracts (interactions) in scope for the target technology architecture; these logical infrastructure components group infrastructure services together based on common requirements/characteristics, Definitions for the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture; the domains will need to decide whether characteristics are needed at the conceptual services level, logical component level, or both, Descriptions of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Characteristics of the contracts (interactions) between the logical infrastructure components (in table format) in scope for the target technology architecture, Any relationships between the business function categories, business functions, logical infrastructure components, and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any relationships between the business services and infrastructure services that are in scope for the target architecture, Any assumptions that have been used to define the target technology architecture; for example, one assumption (recommendation) that has already been stated is that the physical technology architecture is out of scope for the Reference Architecture.>>.

How Did Gary Mcspadden Die, Articles T